RSS logo

Mailing-list Pace

< Altre opzioni e info >

Aiuta PeaceLink

Sostieni la telematica per la pace:

  • Donazione online con PayPal
  • C.C.P. 13403746 intestato ad Associazione PeaceLink, C.P. 2009, 74100 Taranto
  • Conto Corrente Bancario c/o Banca Popolare Etica, intestato ad Associazione PeaceLink - IBAN: IT65 A050 1804 0000 0001 1154 580
Motore di ricerca in

Lista Pace


    Report on UN future - good diagnosis, but poor prescription

    Un altro commento interessante riguardo il progetto di riforma delle NU.
    (in la traduzione in italiano)
    Human Rights Watch Press

    More Needed to Restore Legitimacy of Commission on Human Rights

    (Geneva, December 2, 2004) -- A report on the future of the United
    Nations, ordered last year by Secretary-General Kofi Annan and officially
    released today, accurately diagnoses the sorry state of the U.N.
    Commission on Human Rights but proposes an inadequate cure, Human Rights
    Watch said today.

    The report is on target in recognizing that gross human rights violators
    seek seats on the Commission to protect themselves from criticism. But
    instead of establishing membership criteria linked to a member state's
    human rights record, the panel members give up the battle and recommend
    expanding the Commission to include all 191 U.N. members.

    Among its key findings, the report highlights that the Commission suffers
    a serious problem of credibility that casts doubts on the overall
    reputation of the United Nations. The report, entitled "A More Secure
    World: Our Shared Responsibility" and prepared by an panel of eminent
    persons, notes that the Commission's most serious problem is that so many
    of its 53 member states are themselves responsible for serious human
    rights violations.

    "The report is on target in recognizing that gross human rights violators
    seek seats on the Commission to protect themselves from criticism," said
    Joanna Weschler, U.N. advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. "But
    instead of establishing membership criteria linked to a state's human
    rights record, the panel members give up the battle and recommend
    expanding the Commission to include all 191 U.N. members."

    This recommendation is inconsistent with the report's own analysis. In a
    section on the General Assembly, the only U.N. body with universal
    membership so far, the report states that the Assembly has lost its focus
    and recommends that it establish "smaller, more tightly focused

    The General Assembly has hardly been a reliable defender of human rights.
    Just days ago, it voted not to take any action on or even discuss several
    resolutions against highly abusive states: Sudan, whose ethnic cleansing
    is responsible for ongoing crimes against humanity in its western region
    of Darfur, as well as Zimbabwe, and Belarus. Even the Commission with its
    current membership had succeeded in criticizing Belarus earlier this year.

    "There's little that a 191-member body could accomplish during a six-week
    session. At best, it would be yet another talk shop," Weschler said.

    Human Rights Watch has argued that governments wishing to serve on the
    Commission should fulfill membership criteria and make specific rights
    commitments prior to their election. In addition, the Commission on Human
    Rights should become a standing body, capable of acting upon crises as
    they occur rather than waiting for the six- week annual session. In its
    report, the Panel recommends the creation in the unspecified future of a
    Human Rights Council, which presumably would be permanent.

    Among many other issues covered by the report, Human Rights Watch welcomed
    the prominent place that the report gives to the recommendation that the
    Security Council should stand ready to use its authority to refer cases to
    the International Criminal Court.

    Also of great value are recommendations made regarding the responsibility
    of the United Nations to protect civilians from atrocities and mass
    killings committed by their governments. Human Rights Watch supports the
    five criteria of legitimacy laid out in the Panel's report, but criticized
    the lack of reference to international humanitarian law as the
    indispensable guiding principle of any military action. Significantly,
    the report calls on the permanent members of the Security Council to
    "refrain from the use of the veto in cases of genocide and large scale
    human rights abuses" ? a recommendation that Human Rights Watch strongly

    Human Rights Watch endorsed the report's proposed definition of terrorism.
    The report found that the right to resist foreign occupation does not
    imply a right to target civilians and noncombatants.

    "Nothing justifies deliberately attacking civilians," Weschler said.

    Human Rights Watch also welcomed the report's recommendations addressing
    the due process concerns related to the listing of individuals and
    entities identified as supporters of al-Qaeda as well as lists created by
    some other Security Council sanctions regimes.

    "We have been concerned for years about the lack of due process behind the
    listing and delisting of individuals and entities targeted for sanctions,"
    Weschler said. "The Panel was right to press for this problem finally to
    be addressed."

    Human Rights Watch Press release


    The Human Rights Headlines mailing list provides daily news based on press
    releases issued by national, regional and international non-governmental
    and international organisations. HREA does not take any responsibility
    for the accuracy or content of these new items nor does it necessarily
    endorse them. Archives of "hr-headlines", as well as instructions on how
    to (un)subscribe to the list, can be found at:

    PeaceLink C.P. 2009 - 74100 Taranto (Italy) - CCP 13403746 - Sito realizzato con PhPeace 2.5.8 - Informativa sulla Privacy - Informativa sui cookies - Diritto di replica - Posta elettronica certificata (PEC)