Pace

Lista Pace

Archivio pubblico

Human right watch denuncia gli abusi dell'esercito USA in Afghanistan

Nella relazione si denunciano le pratiche illegali operate in Afghanistan, con detenzioni arbitrarie di civili , uso eccessivo della forza durante gli arresti, maltrattamenti di detenuti e nessun processo legale
9 marzo 2004
Human right watch

Afghanistan: Abuses by U.S. Forces
Beatings in Detention; No Legal Process
(New York, March 8, 2004) – U.S. forces operating in Afghanistan have arbitrarily detained civilians, used excessive force during arrests of non-combatants, and mistreated detainees, Human Rights Watch said in a new report released today.

"The United States is setting a terrible example in Afghanistan on detention practices. Civilians are being held in a legal black hole – with no tribunals, no legal counsel, no family visits and no basic legal protections"
Brad Adams, executive director of the Asia division of Human Rights Watch

Human Rights Watch concludes that the U.S.-administered system of arrest and detention in Afghanistan exists outside of the rule of law. The United States is maintaining separate detention facilities at Bagram, Kandahar, Jalalabad and Asadabad military bases.

"The United States is setting a terrible example in Afghanistan on detention practices," said Brad Adams, executive director of the Asia division of Human Rights Watch. "Civilians are being held in a legal black hole – with no tribunals, no legal counsel, no family visits and no basic legal protections."

The 59-page report, "Enduring Freedom": Abuses by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, is based on research conducted by Human Rights Watch in Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2003 and early 2004. Human Rights Watch documented cases of U.S. forces using military tactics, including unprovoked deadly force, during operations to apprehend civilians in uncontested residential areas—situations where law enforcement standards and tactics should have been used. Afghan forces deployed with U.S. forces have also mistreated persons during search and arrest operations and looted homes.

The report also details mistreatment in U.S. detention facilities. Released detainees have said that U.S. forces severely beat them, doused them with cold water and subjected them to freezing temperatures. Many said they were forced to stay awake, or to stand or kneel in painful positions for extended periods of time.

"There is compelling evidence suggesting that U.S. personnel have committed acts against detainees amounting to torture or cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment," said Adams.

The report also describes frequent arbitrary arrests of civilians, apparently based on mistaken or faulty intelligence, and numerous cases of civilians—grocers, farmers, or laborers—who were held incommunicado and indefinitely.

Human Rights Watch said that many of the violations documented were reported in non-combat situations, and emphasized that many abuses—especially arbitrary arrests and mistreatment of detainees—were inexcusable even within the context of war.

Human Rights Watch said that Taliban and other anti-U.S. forces operating in Afghanistan had themselves violated international humanitarian law by carrying out armed attacks and abductions against civilians and humanitarian aid workers. But Human Rights Watch pointed out that under international law those violations could not serve as an excuse for U.S. violations.

"The Taliban and other insurgent groups are illegally targeting civilians and humanitarian aid workers," said Adams. "But abuses by one party to a conflict do not justify violations by the other side. This is a fundamental principle of the laws of war."

The United States has not responded adequately to questions about arrest and detention practices. In particular, Human Rights Watch raised the case of three detainees who are known to have died while in U.S. custody—two at the Bagram airbase north of Kabul in December 2002 and one at the Asadabad airbase in eastern Afghanistan in June 2003. The first two deaths were ruled homicides by U.S. military pathologists who performed autopsies on the two men. U.S. officials have yet to explain what happened to any of the three men.

"This stonewalling must stop," said Adams. "The United States is obligated to investigate allegations and prosecute those who have violated the law. There is no sign that serious investigations are taking place."

Human Rights Watch said that the United States was eroding international standards by not taking action.

"Abusive governments across the world can now point to U.S. forces in Afghanistan, and say, 'If they can abuse human rights and get away with it, why can't we?'" said Adams.

President George W. Bush and officials in his administration stated in June 2003 that the United States does not torture or mistreat detainees in the custody of the United States. But the United States has refused to allow any independent observers access to detention facilities in Afghanistan, except for the International Committee of the Red Cross, which does not report publicly on its findings. Human Rights Watch noted that some documented abuses in the report took place after President Bush's statement.

The report includes the following recommendations to the United States:
Investigate and publicly report on allegations of mistreatment at detention facilities in Afghanistan;

Instruct military and intelligence personnel to take all appropriate steps to prevent or stop abuses by Afghan forces deployed with or under the command of U.S. forces;

Create a legal system of tribunals, in conjunction with the Afghan government, to ensure that detainees in Afghanistan—both combatants and civilians—are processed and screened in accordance with applicable standards of the Geneva Conventions and human rights law;

Permit families of detainees, and those providing legal assistance, to visit detainees;

Reevaluate and revise arrest methods and standing Rules of Engagement for U.S. military and intelligence personnel in Afghanistan to ensure that law enforcement methods are used when U.S. forces are arresting non-combatants in non-combat situations.
The report also calls on Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the Afghan government to urge the United States to bring their detention system within Afghanistan into compliance with international law, and to order Afghan commanders to stop or attempt to prevent abuses during military operations.

Note: http://hrw.org/reports/2004/afghanistan0304/

Il report completo di HRW

Articoli correlati

  • Rivelò crimini di guerra in Afghanistan: lo stanno processando
    Conflitti
    Si tratta dell'ex-avvocato militare australiano David McBride

    Rivelò crimini di guerra in Afghanistan: lo stanno processando

    L’ultima udienza è si è tenuta il 12 novembre 2023. Mentre entrava in tribunale McBride ha dichiarato: “Oggi servo il mio Paese”. Rischia fino a 50 anni di carcere ma rivendica di aver agito nell'interesse pubblico rivelando azioni criminali. Organizziamo un'azione di sostegno dall'Italia?
    16 novembre 2023 - Redazione PeaceLink
  • Schede
    Whistleblower

    David William McBride

    David William McBride è un informatore australiano ed ex maggiore dell'esercito britannico ed avvocato dell'esercito australiano. Dal 2014 al 2016 McBride ha fornito all'Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) informazioni sui crimini di guerra commessi dai soldati australiani in Afghanistan.
    16 novembre 2023 - Redazione PeaceLink
  • Schede
    Il 26 maggio 2004 il New York Times riconobbe i propri errori pubblicando un articolo

    Le presunte armi di distruzione di massa di Saddam in Iraq

    Giornali come il New York Times, fino al 2003 ostili alla guerra, finirono per accettare come veritiere le affermazioni di Powell e per considerare ineluttabile l'intervento armato. A guerra terminata non fu trovata alcuna traccia di quelle fantomatiche armi.
    16 novembre 2023
  • L'Assemblea generale dell'ONU vota per la fine dell'embargo a Cuba
    Latina
    Una sola nazione si è astenuta: l'Ucraina

    L'Assemblea generale dell'ONU vota per la fine dell'embargo a Cuba

    Solo due nazioni hanno votato per mantenere l'embargo: Stati Uniti e Israele.
    L'embargo a Cuba è stato istituito dagli Stati Uniti nel 1960, in risposta alla rivoluzione cubana guidata da Fidel Castro. L'anno successivo la CIA organizzò anche un tentativo di invasione che però fallì.
    3 novembre 2023 - Redazione PeaceLink
PeaceLink C.P. 2009 - 74100 Taranto (Italy) - CCP 13403746 - Sito realizzato con PhPeace 2.7.14 - Informativa sulla Privacy - Informativa sui cookies - Diritto di replica - Posta elettronica certificata (PEC)