NATO's Atomic Silence
Indeed, there is not a single word on the end of the recently expired New START treaty, which constituted the nuclear security architecture for long-range ballistic missiles. There is no call to reconstruct a new legal framework to limit the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia.
On February 5, 2026, the last bastion of strategic arms control expired. New START expired without the United States, NATO's principal ally, lifting a finger to renew it or initiate a new treaty.
Russia has stated its readiness to voluntarily comply with the treaty's quantitative limits (1,550 warheads and 700 delivery systems each) even after their expiration. This commitment, however, is strictly conditional on similar behavior by the United States. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reiterated that the moratorium declared by President Putin will remain in effect only until the United States also exceeds its limits.
Then there is another problem.
In fact, the other very important treaty on Euromissiles, the INF Treaty, has also lapsed.
So what?
Today, for the first time since the Cold War, the two major nuclear powers are operating without any legal constraints , without inspections, without transparency. The NPT Treaty is the last flimsy hold we have left. But NATO remains silent on resuming negotiations, just as the UN conference on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons begins.
How come?
It's important to remember the provisions of Article VI of the NPT, because it is a cornerstone of the entire Treaty. Article VI imposes the obligation to pursue negotiations in good faith for the cessation of the nuclear arms race , for nuclear disarmament , and for a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict international supervision . The International Court of Justice has reiterated that this is not a rhetorical wish, but a specific legal obligation to be pursued to completion. Yet, the conduct of NATO, and of the United States, which leads it, goes precisely in the opposite direction. Letting New START die without proposing an alternative is not a diplomatic incident: it is a refusal to negotiate for nuclear disarmament.
The Trump administration has let New START expire without a plan for nuclear disarmament. Indeed, the intent is to return to the nuclear arms race. Under Secretary of Defense for Arms Control Thomas DiNanno has said that the United States stands ready, if the President so orders, to expand current forces, diversify capabilities, and develop and deploy new theater nuclear forces.
“Theater forces” are nuclear weapons designed to operate in a regional “theater of operations” (for example, Europe, the Middle East, or the Far East), rather than directly targeting the territory of superpowers (such as the United States or Russia).
In other words: the White House wants a free hand to rearm without constraints. And NATO is passively submitting to the diktat, limiting itself to hurling accusations at Russia and China, as if Washington were a victim and not the main architect of the current strategic vacuum. This is a betrayal of Article VI because abandoning arms control is the exact opposite of pursuing negotiations to end the arms race. NATO, which even references the NPT in its statement, fails to call for a new treaty, effectively legitimizing Trump's stance, especially since within NATO , France wants to increase its nuclear warheads to assume the role of the power offering the European nuclear umbrella against Russia.
The NPT Review Conference, which opens on April 27 in New York, cannot ignore this scenario. If the non-proliferation regime is to survive, it must have the courage to call a spade a spade: Article VI risks being openly violated. And NATO's decision to remain silent on the end of New START is the clearest proof that the Alliance is no longer a guarantor of disarmament, but an obstacle.
NATO governments, starting with Italy, must be asked—during the weeks of the review conference—to break their silence and formalize the immediate start of negotiations for a new nuclear arms limitation treaty between the United States and Russia.
This is not the time for indifference. Without a treaty limiting nuclear warheads, the risk of a new, extremely dangerous nuclear arms race is more real than ever. Everyone must make their voices heard and take a stand to prevent nuclear warheads from increasing again and threatening the future of humanity.
Articoli correlati
Albert, international pacifist bulletinUkraine: the uprising of the squares against the military "meat grinder"
The sacking of popular Defence Minister Fedorov has sparked unprecedented protests in Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities. At the heart of the anger from protesters and the families of soldiers is the strategy of Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi, accused of sacrificing too many human lives.18 July 2026 - Redazione PeaceLink
Albert, bollettino pacifista internazionaleUcraina: la rivolta delle piazze contro il "tritacarne" militare
Il siluramento del popolare ministro della Difesa Fedorov accende proteste senza precedenti a Kiev e in altre città ucraine. Al centro della rabbia dei manifestanti e dei familiari dei soldati c'è la strategia del Comandante in Capo Syrskyi, accusato di sacrificare troppe vite umane.18 July 2026 - Redazione PeaceLink
Il caso del generale Grynkewic, Comandante Supremo della NATO in EuropaSe i generali frenano la psicosi bellica dei politici
Il ministro della Difesa tedesco, il socialdemocratico Pistorius, ha ipotizzato davanti al parlamento un attacco russo all’Europa entro il 2029. Per Macron occorre essere pronti anche a “versare il sangue”. Ma il generale che comanda la NATO europea smentisce tutti con i dati dell’intelligence.17 July 2026 - Redazione PeaceLink
Albert, international pacifist bulletinGaza, July 2026: the crisis continues amid bombings, hunger, and impunity
As of 17 July 2026, the most reliable quantitative data indicates that the overall Palestinian death toll in the Gaza Strip exceeds 73,000 dead and 173,000 injured since the start of the war on 7 October 2023. In July, the list of journalists killed in Gaza has grown longer.17 July 2026 - PeaceLink staff


sociale.network